Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Angie Y.
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.
Voice your opinion (talk page) (0/0/0); Scheduled to end 00:35, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Angie Y. (talk · contribs) - Is sweet, gentle, nice, has HFA, hates DIMEists Angie Y. 00:35, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:Thank you so much. I accept!
Questions for the candidate
[edit]Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. You may wish to answer the following optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
- A:User blocking and warning. I want to stand up for the community.
- 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
- A:My best contributions are contributions made to articlles concerning my favorite TV shows, like Code Lyoko, Danny Phantom, and Sailor Moon among others.
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
General comments
[edit]- See Angie Y.'s edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.
- Links for Angie Y.: Angie Y. (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
Please keep criticism constructive and polite. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Angie Y. before commenting.
Discussion
[edit]Support
Oppose
- Oppose for the sorely inadequate answers to questions, the "hates DIMEists" part of the nom, and this. Regarding the last, it is more of the fact that you filed a RfAr at such a premature stage rather than the dispute itself. —Kurykh 00:51, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose, per Kurykh. User is currently involved in a dispute. Andre (talk) 00:53, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose - Bad answers to questions and seem to be in a dispute, per Kurykh. Anonymous DissidentTalk 01:01, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
You have a large edit-count, but, as we all should know by now, edit count isnt everything, and the answers to the questions were among the weakest I have ever seen. Anonymous DissidentTalk 00:50, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.